当前位置: X-MOL 学术Comparative and Continental Philosophy › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Playing in the Non-representational Mode of Thinking: A Comparison of Derrida, Dōgen, and Zhuangzi
Comparative and Continental Philosophy ( IF 0.1 ) Pub Date : 2020-01-02 , DOI: 10.1080/17570638.2020.1709684
Carl Olson 1
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT The representational mode of thinking assumes a correspondence between appearance and reality that is supported by a metaphysical edifice. This way of thinking uses the metaphor of the mirror, which suggests a reflected image of consciousness and confusion between the representation and original consciousness. Jacque Derrida, a leading postmodern philosopher, wants to overcome the mode of representational thinking and extricate himself from it by attempting to think and emphasize differences. Like Derrida, the Daoist sage Zhuangzi and the Japanese Zen master Dōgen also seek to avoid representational thinking; however, these Eastern philosophers accomplish this in a very different way. This paper will compare their differences with respect to overcoming the representational mode of thinking.

中文翻译:

玩非具象的思维方式:德里达、道元、庄子之比较

摘要 表征思维模式假设了形而上学大厦支持的表象与现实之间的对应关系。这种思维方式使用了镜子的比喻,暗示了意识的反射图像以及表象和原始意识之间的混淆。著名的后现代哲学家雅克·德里达(Jacque Derrida)希望通过尝试思考和强调差异来克服表征思维模式并从中解脱出来。与德里达一样,道家圣人庄子和日本禅师道元也力求避免具象思维;然而,这些东方哲学家以非常不同的方式实现了这一点。本文将比较它们在克服表征思维方式方面的差异。
更新日期:2020-01-02
down
wechat
bug