a rhetorician, especially through her work in visual rhetoric. Fleckenstein contents that, “Left unexplored is the work, especially the memory work, performed by women as imagesmiths— significant figures in the visual rhetorical tradition—as their use of images circulates across the permeable boundaries of the private and the public” (139). Fleckenstein fills this space by situating the parlor as a public and private space and the photo album as a strategic example of visual rhetoric. Both of these chapters are particularly compelling as they serve as illustrations of and theoretical frameworks for conducting recovery work on unknown women. Despite its strengths, the edited collection is not without its shortcomings. Except for three essays (written by Martin, Presbey, and Quandahl), the collection focuses on the narratives of white, middleto upper-class women in the nineteenth and twentieth century—a detriment the editors themselves acknowledge (259). Additionally, in a collection emphasizing archival methods, readers may expect more essays focusing on unknown women rather than reexaminations of known figures. Overall, Gaillet and Bailey, along with each of the collection contributors, deliver a noteworthy contribution to feminist rhetorical scholarship. Remembering Women Differently provides the background for students to use the chapters as research starting points. The theoretical frameworks and case studies also are indispensable to feminist rhetoric and publicmemory scholars conducting similar research and, hopefully, they help ensure that in the future even more women who have been overlooked will have their rhetorical efforts remembered.

中文翻译：

---

说存在：维尔纳·艾哈德、马丁·海德格尔和人类的新可能性

修辞学家，尤其是通过她在视觉修辞方面的工作。弗莱肯斯坦的内容是，“未被探索的是由女性作为图像匠——视觉修辞传统中的重要人物——进行的工作，尤其是记忆工作，因为她们对图像的使用跨越了私人和公共的可渗透边界”（139） . Fleckenstein 将客厅定位为公共和私人空间，将相册定位为视觉修辞的战略范例，从而填补了这一空间。这两章都特别引人注目，因为它们作为对未知女性进行康复工作的说明和理论框架。尽管有其优势，但经过编辑的集合并非没有缺点。除了三篇散文（由 Martin、Presbey 和 Quandahl 撰写）外，该系列集中于白人的叙事，19 世纪和 20 世纪的中上层女性——编辑们自己也承认这是一种损害（259）。此外，在强调档案方法的集合中，读者可能会期待更多关注不知名女性的文章，而不是对已知人物的重新审视。总体而言，Gaillet 和 Bailey 以及每位收藏贡献者都对女权主义修辞学做出了值得注意的贡献。以不同的方式记住女性为学生使用这些章节作为研究起点提供了背景。理论框架和案例研究对于进行类似研究的女权主义修辞和公共记忆学者来说也是必不可少的，希望它们有助于确保将来更多被忽视的女性能够记住她们的修辞努力。