当前位置: X-MOL 学术Research in Dance Education › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Validating the dance fundamental movement skills assessment for balance
Research in Dance Education ( IF 0.8 ) Pub Date : 2020-06-30 , DOI: 10.1080/14647893.2020.1781075
Juanita Patterson-Price 1 , Gregory Gutierrez 2
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT

The Dance Fundamental Movement Skills Assessment (DFMS-A) examines fundamental movement skills as described by Footprints Dance Project in their teaching resource: Footprints Movement Tool. It was designed to inform teaching practice, highlighting students’ strengths and weaknesses. In addition to providing holistic assessment for the whole dancer, the DFMS-A provides an extended score range encompassing the higher level of corporal expectation demanded of dancers, as opposed to pass/fail metrics (normal/abnormal). The current study aims to evaluate the validity and reliability of the balance component of the DFMS-A using a sample population from the University. The DFMS-A was compared with three standard physical assessments of balance: Y balance test, Single Leg Stance (SLS) test, and Functional reach test. Pearson Correlations demonstrated significant correlations between the DFMS-A and Y balance and SLS tests respectively (r = 0.745–0.974; p < 0.008), with minimal correlation found with the Functional Reach test. Intra-rater reliability was tested 1.5 years after the original assessment was completed, and demonstrated high reliability (>85%). These positive results support the use of the DFMS-A as a comprehensive balance assessment with more depth than current tests, suggesting it may warrant further testing in other aspects of functional movement such as weight transfer and body alignment.



中文翻译:

验证舞蹈基本动作技能评估的平衡

摘要

舞蹈基本动作技能评估 (DFMS-A) 会检查脚印舞蹈项目在其教学资源:脚印动作工具中描述的基本动作技能。它旨在为教学实践提供信息,突出学生的优势和劣势。除了为整个舞者提供整体评估之外,DFMS-A 还提供了一个扩展的分数范围,包括对舞者要求的更高水平的身体期望,而不是通过/失败指标(正常/异常)。目前的研究旨在使用来自大学的样本群体来评估 DFMS-A 平衡组件的有效性和可靠性。DFMS-A 与三种标准的平衡身体评估进行了比较:Y 平衡测试、单腿站立 (SLS) 测试和功能伸展测试。Pearson 相关性分别证明了 DFMS-A 和 Y 平衡与 SLS 测试之间的显着相关性(r = 0.745–0.974;p < 0.008),与功能范围测试的相关性最小。在最初评估完成 1.5 年后测试了评分者内的可靠性,并证明了高可靠性(>85%)。这些积极的结果支持使用 DFMS-A 作为综合平衡评估,比目前的测试更深入,这表明它可能需要在功能运动的其他方面进行进一步测试,例如重量转移和身体对齐。原始评估完成后 5 年,并表现出高可靠性 (>85%)。这些积极的结果支持使用 DFMS-A 作为综合平衡评估,比目前的测试更深入,这表明它可能需要在功能运动的其他方面进行进一步测试,例如重量转移和身体对齐。原始评估完成后 5 年,并表现出高可靠性 (>85%)。这些积极的结果支持使用 DFMS-A 作为综合平衡评估,比目前的测试更深入,这表明它可能需要在功能运动的其他方面进行进一步测试,例如重量转移和身体对齐。

更新日期:2020-06-30
down
wechat
bug