More than twenty years after Augusto Pinochet’s arrest in London, this special issue examines the globalization of post-dictatorial and post-conflict justice and memory processes through the lens of interconnections and mutual influences between Europe and South America. The collection challenges the currently dominant literature on reckoning with violent pasts. It does so by moving beyond both analyses confined within specific national borders and diffusionist accounts of socalled “universalised” justice and mnemonic paradigms purportedly embraced worldwide. The Trans-Atlantic perspective provides scholars with an ideal opportunity to analyse empirically the nexus between global and local scales of action, and to highlight agency in transnational mnemopolitics. Through case studies of trans-regional entanglements, we contend that the globalization of memory and justice paradigms goes hand in handwith a fragmentation of, and on occasion competition between different narratives concerning dictatorial pasts, between international, regional and local understandings of “best practices” of dealing with political violence, and between various professional groups engaged in accountability and remembrance processes. The collection shows the multi-faceted nature of transnational transfers and collaborations, some of which reflect concepts that have become significant in the international arena, while others mirror ideas and practices with limited global impact that circulate only between “semi-peripheries” or between less influential networks of activists. Since the 1990s, accelerated globalization and increasing world connectivity have led to the circulation of justice and mnemonic models across the globe and to the emergence of a multitude of transnational spaces of activism concerned with anti-impunity and memorialization processes. Yet, the scarcity of empirically informed research examining concrete transfers and exchanges across world regions remains striking. We by and large still lack any thorough investigation of these linkages, comprising cross-border relations between non-state actors. Against this background, the collection focuses on concrete forms of transregional mobilization and circulation of ideas between two continents—Europe and Latin America—that have been at the forefront of the global processes of

中文翻译：

---

“正义、记忆和跨国网络。欧洲和南美的纠缠”

奥古斯托·皮诺切特在伦敦被捕 20 多年后，本期特刊通过欧洲和南美之间的相互联系和相互影响的视角，审视了后独裁和冲突后司法和记忆过程的全球化。该系列挑战了目前关于暴力过去的主流文献。它超越了局限在特定国界内的分析和所谓的“普遍化”正义和助记范式的扩散主义解释，据称全世界都接受了这一点。跨大西洋视角为学者们提供了一个理想的机会来实证分析全球和地方行动尺度之间的联系，并强调跨国记忆政治中的能动性。通过跨区域纠缠的案例研究，我们认为，记忆和正义范式的全球化与有关独裁历史的不同叙述之间、国际、区域和地方对处理政治暴力的“最佳做法”的理解之间以及各种参与问责和纪念过程的专业团体。该系列展示了跨国转移和合作的多面性，其中一些反映了在国际舞台上具有重要意义的概念，而另一些则反映了仅在“半外围”之间或在较小范围之间传播的具有有限全球影响的想法和实践。有影响力的活动家网络。自 1990 年代以来，加速的全球化和日益增强的世界连通性导致正义和助记模型在全球范围内流通，并出现了大量与反有罪不罚和纪念进程有关的跨国激进主义空间。然而，检验跨世界地区的具体转移和交换的实证研究的稀缺性仍然令人震惊。总的来说，我们仍然缺乏对这些联系的彻底调查，包括非国家行为者之间的跨境关系。在此背景下，该系列聚焦欧洲和拉丁美洲两大洲之间跨区域动员和思想交流的具体形式，它们一直处于全球进程的前沿。