ABSTRACT This article shows how pacifism is discursively constituted within politics. Employing Critical Discourse Analysis, it demonstrates how official narratives worked to depoliticise pacifism during the 2015 House of Commons debate on taking military action against ISIS in Syria. It argues that the current rejection of pacifism within politics rests upon a flawed narrative and considers the interests that are served by this. Overall, this article calls for pacifism to be de-subjugated and considers the profound political implication this would have.

中文翻译：

---

英国议会话语中对和平主义的压制：分析 2015 年轰炸叙利亚的辩论

摘要 本文展示了和平主义是如何在政治中以话语方式构成的。采用批判性话语分析，它展示了官方叙述如何在 2015 年下议院关于对叙利亚的伊斯兰国采取军事行动的辩论中使和平主义去政治化。它认为，当前政治中对和平主义的拒绝基于一种有缺陷的叙述，并考虑了由此带来的利益。总体而言，本文呼吁取消和平主义，并考虑这将产生的深刻政治含义。