ABSTRACT The marketplace of ideas metaphor remains one of the Supreme Court’s most enduring tools for communicating understandings regarding freedom of expression. For nearly a century, justices from a variety of judicial philosophies, in several areas of First Amendment law, including commercial speech, defamation, and obscenity, have called upon the metaphor to help them convey what have ultimately become crucial interpretations regarding the Amendment’s protections. Metaphors, however, do not have static meanings. In light of the important considerations of paradigmatic social and technological changes that have substantially altered the very nature of the marketplace of ideas in society, particularly in the era of social media, fake news, and artificially intelligent communicators, this essay examines how the marketplace metaphor can be both reinterpreted and reimagined to account for a substantially different twenty-first-century information environment while remaining faithful to its author’s understandings about the nature of truth. To this end, this essay examines how Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes understood truth, considers differences between Enlightenment and discursive-based understandings regarding the flow of communication in democratic society, and explores how the Supreme Court has traditionally employed the metaphor. Finally, it proposes a revised conceptualization of the marketplace of ideas, ultimately labeled as the “discursive marketplace.”

中文翻译：

---

迈向轻描淡写的思想市场：重新想象社交媒体，假新闻和人工智能时代的市场隐喻

摘要观念隐喻市场仍然是最高法院用于传达有关表达自由的理解的最持久的工具之一。近一个世纪以来，《第一修正案》法律的各个领域中，来自各种司法哲学的法官，包括商业演讲，诽谤和ob亵行为，都呼吁这种隐喻来帮助他们传达最终成为有关《修正案》保护的关键解释的内容。但是，隐喻没有静态含义。考虑到范式社会和技术变革的重要考虑已大大改变了社会观念市场的本质，特别是在社交媒体，假新闻和人工智能传播者时代，本文探讨了如何重新解释和重新构想市场隐喻，以说明一个完全不同的二十一世纪信息环境，同时忠实于其对真理本质的理解。为此，本文探讨了奥利弗·温德尔·霍尔姆斯大法官如何理解真理，考虑了启蒙运动与基于话语的关于民主社会中交流流的理解之间的差异，并探讨了最高法院传统上是如何使用这种隐喻的。最后，它提出了对思想市场的修订概念，最终被标记为“分布式市场”。考虑了启蒙运动与基于话语的理解之间在民主社会中交流流之间的区别，并探讨了最高法院传统上是如何运用这种隐喻的。最后，它提出了对思想市场的修订概念，最终被标记为“分布式市场”。考虑了启蒙运动与基于话语的理解之间在民主社会中的交流流之间的差异，并探讨了最高法院传统上是如何使用这种隐喻的。最后，它提出了对思想市场的修订概念，最终被标记为“分布式市场”。