当前位置: X-MOL 学术Fabrications › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Vernacular Transformations
Fabrications ( IF 0.2 ) Pub Date : 2020-01-02 , DOI: 10.1080/10331867.2020.1724667
Paul Memmott 1 , John Ting 2
Affiliation  

Paul Oliver’s 1997 “Encyclopaedia of Vernacular Architecture of theWorld” (EVAW) was the first comprehensive compilation of Southeast Asia’s and Oceania’s vernacular houses, and work on the second edition (EVAW 2) has been under way since 2015 under the editorship of Marcel Vellinga at Oxford Brookes University. EVAW 2 will continue the outstanding scholarship on the region’s rich and diverse vernacular house architecture highlighting its distinctiveness and relationships with social and cultural structures. However, in the updating of entries, clear signs of transformation of traditions have emerged due to rapid social, cultural, economic and technological changes in Southeast Asia and Oceania’s vernacular houses (e.g. see Figure 1). These transformations could not be further explored in the brevity of the Encyclopaedia entries, and so this issue of Fabrications called for higher-level reflections and theorisations of these dynamic transformations and their relationships with modern worlds. It seeks to understand the tensions brought about by regional and sub-regional modernisation and cultural change, and the effect of these tensions on the historical morphologies and building typologies of vernacular house architectures. Methodologically, conservative architectural historiographies have often positioned vernacular (and non-western) architecture in opposition to modern architecture. In the late twentieth-century vernacular architecture was not considered dynamic, multi-faceted and progressive, but relatively static, resistant to change and lacking modern relevance. This position has sinced changed in the global field of vernacular architecture. Early 21 century theoretical advances in architectural history and theory have sought to close the gap between vernacular and modern architecture. Recent scholarship has questioned this binary opposition, and has begun to expand approaches to vernacular architecture. In addition, postcolonial methodologies are dispelling the myth that one dominant group can monopolise the processes of modernisation, and are arguing that contemporary and historical relationships between vernacular and modern may be a result of complex social, cultural and political negotiations between disparate stakeholders. In terms of vernacular architecture, this involves a process of decolonisation, and of using critical multidisciplinary methodologies to broaden and break down conservative FABRICATIONS 2020, VOL. 30, NO. 1, 1–10 https://doi.org/10.1080/10331867.2020.1724667

中文翻译:

白话转换

保罗奥利弗 1997 年出版的“世界乡土建筑百科全书”(EVAW)是东南亚和大洋洲乡土建筑的第一部综合汇编,第二版(EVAW 2)的工作自 2015 年起由 Marcel Vellinga 主编在牛津布鲁克斯大学。EVAW 2 将继续对该地区丰富多样的乡土房屋建筑的杰出奖学金,突出其独特性以及与社会和文化结构的关系。然而,在条目的更新中,由于东南亚和大洋洲的乡土房屋的快速社会、文化、经济和技术变化,传统转变的明显迹象已经出现(见图1)。在百科全书条目的简短中无法进一步探索这些转换,因此,本期《制造》要求对这些动态转变及其与现代世界的关系进行更高层次的反思和理论化。它试图了解区域和次区域现代化和文化变迁带来的紧张局势,以及这些紧张局势对乡土建筑的历史形态和建筑类型的影响。在方法论上,保守的建筑史学常常将乡土(和非西方)建筑与现代建筑相对立。在 20 世纪后期,乡土建筑不被认为是动态的、多面的和进步的,而是相对静态的,抗拒变化并且缺乏现代相关性。此后,这一立场在全球本土建筑领域发生了变化。21 世纪早期建筑史和理论的理论进步试图缩小乡土建筑与现代建筑之间的差距。最近的学术对这种二元对立提出了质疑,并开始扩展乡土建筑的方法。此外,后殖民方法正在消除一个主导群体可以垄断现代化进程的神话,并认为白话与现代之间的当代和历史关系可能是不同利益相关者之间复杂的社会、文化和政治谈判的结果。就乡土建筑而言,这涉及一个非殖民化过程,以及使用关键的多学科方法来扩大和打破保守的 FABRICATIONS 2020,VOL。30,没有。1, 1–10 https://doi.org/10.1080/10331867.2020.1724667 最近的学术对这种二元对立提出了质疑,并开始扩展乡土建筑的方法。此外,后殖民方法正在消除一个主导群体可以垄断现代化进程的神话,并认为白话与现代之间的当代和历史关系可能是不同利益相关者之间复杂的社会、文化和政治谈判的结果。就乡土建筑而言,这涉及一个非殖民化过程,以及使用关键的多学科方法来扩大和打破保守的 FABRICATIONS 2020,VOL。30,没有。1, 1–10 https://doi.org/10.1080/10331867.2020.1724667 最近的学术对这种二元对立提出了质疑,并开始扩展乡土建筑的方法。此外,后殖民方法正在消除一个主导群体可以垄断现代化进程的神话,并认为白话与现代之间的当代和历史关系可能是不同利益相关者之间复杂的社会、文化和政治谈判的结果。就乡土建筑而言,这涉及一个非殖民化过程,以及使用关键的多学科方法来扩大和打破保守的 FABRICATIONS 2020,VOL。30,没有。1, 1–10 https://doi.org/10.1080/10331867.2020.1724667 后殖民方法正在消除一个主导群体可以垄断现代化进程的神话,并认为白话与现代之间的当代和历史关系可能是不同利益相关者之间复杂的社会、文化和政治谈判的结果。就乡土建筑而言,这涉及一个非殖民化过程,以及使用关键的多学科方法来扩大和打破保守的 FABRICATIONS 2020,VOL。30,没有。1, 1–10 https://doi.org/10.1080/10331867.2020.1724667 后殖民方法正在消除一个主导群体可以垄断现代化进程的神话,并认为白话与现代之间的当代和历史关系可能是不同利益相关者之间复杂的社会、文化和政治谈判的结果。就乡土建筑而言,这涉及一个非殖民化过程,以及使用关键的多学科方法来扩大和打破保守的 FABRICATIONS 2020,VOL。30,没有。1, 1–10 https://doi.org/10.1080/10331867.2020.1724667 就乡土建筑而言,这涉及一个非殖民化过程,以及使用关键的多学科方法来扩大和打破保守的 FABRICATIONS 2020,VOL。30,没有。1, 1–10 https://doi.org/10.1080/10331867.2020.1724667 就乡土建筑而言,这涉及一个非殖民化过程,以及使用关键的多学科方法来扩大和打破保守的 FABRICATIONS 2020,VOL。30,没有。1, 1–10 https://doi.org/10.1080/10331867.2020.1724667
更新日期:2020-01-02
down
wechat
bug