ABSTRACT Southeast Asia and Oceania have a long tradition of outstanding scholarship that studies the rich and diverse vernacular architectural heritage of the region. Up until the early twenty-first century, this work tended to focus on traditional forms of vernacular architecture, emphasising their regional distinctiveness and analysing the ways in which they reflected social and cultural structures. However, recent decades have seen rapid and fundamental social, economic, and environmental changes in the region that require new perspectives on the design, use, and meaning of vernacular architecture. Processes like population growth, urbanisation, globalisation, climate change, migration, natural disasters, conflicts, and the internationalisation and commercialisation of architectural practice have exerted increasing pressure on vernacular architectural traditions. In recent decades more dynamic and active approaches to the study of vernacular architecture have emerged that attempt to challenge the dichotomies inherent in earlier definitions and representations of the vernacular. Those approaches raise interesting and indeed fundamental questions about the way the vernacular architecture of the region has been represented in the past; about the validity of those representations; and ultimately about how relevant they are in the here and now. Indeed, they call into question the validity and relevance of the concept of vernacularity itself.

中文翻译：

---

生活建筑：重新想象东南亚和大洋洲的本土

摘要 东南亚和大洋洲有着悠久的杰出学术传统，研究该地区丰富多样的乡土建筑遗产。直到 21 世纪初，这项工作往往侧重于乡土建筑的传统形式，强调其地域特色并分析它们反映社会和文化结构的方式。然而，近几十年来，该地区的社会、经济和环境发生了快速而根本的变化，需要对乡土建筑的设计、使用和意义有新的看法。人口增长、城市化、全球化、气候变化、移民、自然灾害、冲突、建筑实践的国际化和商业化对乡土建筑传统施加了越来越大的压力。近几十年来，出现了更多动态和积极的乡土建筑研究方法，试图挑战早先的乡土定义和表示中固有的二分法。这些方法提出了有关该地区乡土建筑过去表现方式的有趣且确实是基本的问题；关于这些陈述的有效性；最终是关于它们在此时此地的相关性。事实上，他们质疑方言概念本身的有效性和相关性。近几十年来，出现了更多动态和积极的乡土建筑研究方法，试图挑战早先的乡土定义和表示中固有的二分法。这些方法提出了有关该地区乡土建筑过去表现方式的有趣且确实是基本的问题；关于这些陈述的有效性；最终是关于它们在此时此地的相关性。事实上，他们质疑方言概念本身的有效性和相关性。近几十年来，出现了更多动态和积极的乡土建筑研究方法，试图挑战早先的乡土定义和表示中固有的二分法。这些方法提出了有关该地区乡土建筑过去表现方式的有趣且确实是基本的问题；关于这些陈述的有效性；最终是关于它们在此时此地的相关性。事实上，他们质疑方言概念本身的有效性和相关性。关于这些陈述的有效性；最终是关于它们在此时此地的相关性。事实上，他们质疑方言概念本身的有效性和相关性。关于这些陈述的有效性；最终是关于它们在此时此地的相关性。事实上，他们质疑方言概念本身的有效性和相关性。