Complex and mechanised, industrial architecture has altered the aesthetic and cultural landscape of places, contesting the normative divisions between structure, form, and ornament, and posing new challenges for architectural analyses. Industrialisation has modified our experience of urban and rural spaces evident in its continuing and residual affects. In exploring the nexus between industry and architecture, this editors’ issue of Fabrications examines the aesthetic, social, and political impact of industrial processes, construction practices, labour, and materials on built environments directly linked to industry. Technological innovation and labour systematisation and its particular uptake in the design and development of industrial complexes, especially as these paralleled the period of avantgarde architectural movements, generate a pendulum swing for the framing of architectural historiography–from that dominated by objects and figures to a much less charted territory of global economies of manufacturing and standardisation, equally fuelling the momentum of modernisation. Our approach is guided, in part, by the seeming neglect of certain industrial sites and architectures, due to the inadequacy of our research methods and historiographical preferences. These lacunas have prompted a much broader framing than the design of industrial complexes, which may immediately come to mind. This issue examines the role of industry in constructing and contesting both the surprising networks and the differential map of modernisation across the geopolitical world through examples from Saudi Arabia, Australia, Indonesia, USSR, and the USA. Histories of the industrial complexes and sites of these places uncover the colonial and transnational dimensions of industry and how its architecture impacted on local cultures and other unprivileged social environments that have evolved due to industry. While a major aspect of the architecture of industry is its use of forefront technologies and processes of manufacturing, how these processes were translated into and infiltrated everyday lives is yet to be comprehensively studied. A forum exploring the case study method as an important approach for uncovering these histories considers the legacy of industrial architecture and its heritage. FABRICATIONS 2019, VOL. 29, NO. 2, 127–130 https://doi.org/10.1080/10331867.2019.1587129

中文翻译：

---

工业+建筑：国家叙事/国际力量

复杂和机械化的工业建筑改变了地方的审美和文化景观，挑战了结构、形式和装饰之间的规范划分，并对建筑分析提出了新的挑战。工业化改变了我们对城市和农村空间的体验，这在其持续和残留的影响中是显而易见的。在探索工业与建筑之间的联系时，本期编辑出版的 Fabrications 研究了工业流程、建筑实践、劳动力和材料对与工业直接相关的建筑环境的美学、社会和政治影响。技术创新和劳动力系统化及其在工业综合体的设计和开发中的特殊应用，特别是当这些与前卫建筑运动时期平行时，为建筑史学的框架产生钟摆摆动——从以物体和人物为主的领域，到全球制造业和标准化经济的地图上少得多的领域，同样推动了现代化的势头。由于我们的研究方法和史学偏好的不足，我们的方法部分受到某些工业场所和建筑的忽视。这些缺陷促成了比工业综合体设计更广泛的框架，工业综合体的设计可能会立即浮现在脑海中。本期通过沙特阿拉伯、澳大利亚、印度尼西亚、苏联和美国的例子，探讨了工业在构建和竞争地缘政治世界中令人惊讶的网络和现代化差异地图方面的作用。这些地方的工业综合体和遗址的历史揭示了工业的殖民和跨国层面，以及其建筑如何影响当地文化和其他因工业而发展的非特权社会环境。虽然工业架构的一个主要方面是使用前沿技术和制造流程，但这些流程如何转化并渗透到日常生活中还有待全面研究。探索案例研究方法作为揭示这些历史的重要方法的论坛考虑了工业建筑的遗产及其遗产。制造 2019，卷。29，没有。2, 127–130 https://doi.org/10.1080/10331867.2019.1587129 虽然工业架构的一个主要方面是使用前沿技术和制造流程，但这些流程如何转化并渗透到日常生活中还有待全面研究。探索案例研究方法作为揭示这些历史的重要方法的论坛考虑了工业建筑的遗产及其遗产。制造 2019，卷。29，没有。2, 127–130 https://doi.org/10.1080/10331867.2019.1587129 虽然工业架构的一个主要方面是使用前沿技术和制造流程，但这些流程如何转化并渗透到日常生活中还有待全面研究。探索案例研究方法作为揭示这些历史的重要方法的论坛考虑了工业建筑的遗产及其遗产。制造 2019，卷。29，没有。2, 127–130 https://doi.org/10.1080/10331867.2019.1587129