ABSTRACT Romantic memory and hermeneutics may be fruitfully studied alongside conceptualizations of the Haskalah, the account of European Judaism’s embrace of Enlightenment ideals of reason in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, which some scholars now see less as a development of the Enlightenment than an engagement of European Romanticism. Jewish literature and philosophy that fall under the aegis of the Haskalah define the claims of Jewish inheritance against its very history. This article argues that the discontinuity with history implied by correction, or progress, is often represented as healed in the fiction that such discontinuity is a discovery of the genuine authenticity of the past. Cultural and religious continuity, then, is a function of interpretation. This article argues further that the study of collective memory calls for interpretive paradigms that themselves depend on conceptualizations of memory. Entering Jewish culture into these circular paradigms—here through the writings of Solomon Maimon, Hyman Hurwitz, and Marion and Celia Moss—both complicates and clarifies them. Jewish memory depends crucially upon interpretation, and takes account of the ethics of interpretation. These authors represent themselves as having propelled themselves into an enlightened present which all the same stands for the authentic meaning of Jewish collective memory.

中文翻译：

---

诠释伦理：浪漫主义中的犹太记忆文化

摘要 浪漫的记忆和诠释学可以与 Haskalah 的概念化一起进行富有成效的研究，Haskalah 是对 18 和 19 世纪欧洲犹太教对启蒙理性理想的接受的描述，现在一些学者认为这与其说是启蒙运动的发展，不如说是欧洲人的参与。浪漫主义。受哈斯卡拉 (Haskalah) 支持的犹太文学和哲学定义了犹太人对其历史的继承要求。本文认为，修正或进步所暗示的与历史的不连续性，通常在小说中被描述为治愈，这种不连续性是对过去真正真实性的发现。因此，文化和宗教的连续性是解释的功能。本文进一步论证了集体记忆的研究需要解释范式，这些范式本身依赖于记忆的概念化。将犹太文化纳入这些循环范式——这里是通过所罗门迈蒙、海曼赫尔维茨、马里昂和西莉亚莫斯的着作——都使它们复杂化并澄清了它们。犹太人的记忆在很大程度上取决于解释，并考虑到解释的伦理。这些作者将自己描述为将自己推进到一个开明的现在，这同样代表了犹太集体记忆的真实含义。犹太人的记忆在很大程度上取决于解释，并考虑到解释的伦理。这些作者将自己描述为将自己推进到一个开明的现在，这同样代表了犹太集体记忆的真实含义。犹太人的记忆在很大程度上取决于解释，并考虑到解释的伦理。这些作者将自己描述为将自己推进到一个开明的现在，这同样代表了犹太集体记忆的真实含义。