Emphasizing the important role of “history” within comparative education is the classic way, much celebrated in the writings of Andreas Kazamias, to treat this theme. This article uses a different perspective. The argument is that “comparative education” and “history” use two words as professional identifiers of a way of thinking and working. Metaphorically, they are wizard words, magical claims that mark off different epistemic territories: “context” for comparative education and “archive” for the historian. The construction and—especially—the confusions, the contradictions, and the consequences within these codings of professional identity and the relationships of the two fields of study are the themes of this article about comparative education.

中文翻译：

---

关于比较教育的思考：以安德烈亚斯·卡扎米亚斯的故事讲故事

强调“历史”在比较教育中的重要作用是治疗这一主题的经典方法，这在安德烈亚斯·哈萨米斯（Andreas Kazamias）的著作中广为赞扬。本文使用了不同的观点。争论是“比较教育”和“历史”使用两个词作为思维和工作方式的专业标识符。隐喻地，它们是巫师的话，是标明不同认识领域的神奇主张：比较教育的“背景”和历史学家的“档案”。这些关于专业身份的编码以及两个研究领域之间的关系中的建构，尤其是混乱，矛盾和后果，是本文关于比较教育的主题。