当前位置: X-MOL 学术Ethics and Education › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Symposium introduction vocabularies of hope in place of vocabularies of critique: can rorty help us to redescribe (philosophy of) education?
Ethics and Education ( IF 0.7 ) Pub Date : 2019-09-18 , DOI: 10.1080/17449642.2019.1669312
Stefano Oliverio 1
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT This introduction outlines the rationale of the symposium 'Vocabularies of Hope in Place of Vocabularies of Critique: Can Rorty Help Us to Redescribe (Philosophy of) Education?'. In particular, it argues that, despite some early statements of Richard Rorty, he may turn out to be a particularly timely thinker in reference to debates occurring in the field of educational theory and philosophy, especially by suggesting an engagement with the latter through vocabularies of hope. Moreover, after highlighting that a valuable dialogue may be established between Rorty's stance and post-critical pedagogy, the introduction describes in broad strokes along which lines this conversation will unfold in the three papers and one response composing the symposium.

中文翻译:

座谈会介绍了希望词汇代替批判性词汇:ro亵可以帮助我们重新描述(哲学)教育吗?

摘要本简介概述了研讨会的基本原理:“希望的词汇代替批判的词汇:罗蒂能帮助我们重新描述(哲学)教育吗?”。特别是,它认为,尽管理查德·罗蒂(Richard Rorty)做出了一些早期声明,但在教育理论和哲学领域发生的辩论中,他可能是一位特别及时的思想家,特别是建议通过以下方面的词汇与后者进行互动:希望。此外,在强调可能在罗蒂的立场和批评后的教育学之间建立起有价值的对话之后,引言大胆地描述了在三篇论文中将进行的对话以及构成专题讨论会的一种回应。
更新日期:2019-09-18
down
wechat
bug