ABSTRACT This paper presents a new model for how to jointly analyze the ethical and evidentiary dimensions of environmental science cases, with an eye toward making science more participatory and publically accountable. To do so, it adapts and expands the existing model of ‘coupled ethical-epistemic analysis,’ developed by Tuana and extended by Katikireddi and Valles. This model is contrasted with the existing literature on the relationship between ethical and epistemic features of philosophical analysis. The model is then applied to two case studies, the Flint, Michigan water contamination crisis and the Menabe, Madagascar Payment for Ecosystem Services conservation program.

中文翻译：

---

伦理-认知分析相结合作为环境科学的工具

摘要本文提出了一种新模型，用于如何共同分析环境科学案例的伦理和证据方面，以期使科学更具参与性和公共责任。为此，它适应并扩展了由Tuana开发并由Katikireddi和Valles扩展的“耦合的伦理-流行病分析”模型。该模型与关于哲学分析的道德特征和认知特征之间关系的现有文献形成对比。然后将该模型应用于两个案例研究，即密歇根州弗林特市的水污染危机和马达加斯加的梅纳贝市生态系统服务付款保护计划。