ABSTRACT This article reports on a multiple-case study of how six educational alliances developed Integrated Logic Models, a new tool that integrates components of multiple programs into a single logic model template to link equity research, practice, and evaluation. These alliances used three related strategies: choosing theories and research that point to activities for advancing student-level and systemic equity; linking research-based activities to outcomes across programs; and merging student-level longitudinal data across programs. This article describes the six alliances, the benefits and challenges they experienced using Integrated Logic Models, and the results of a pattern-matching analysis of organizational change as alliances developed their Integrated Logic Models. Our discussion links our findings to evolving debates about capital, alienation/belonging, and challenge; an emerging shared language; and implications for research, practice, and evaluation. These highlight communities’ cultural resources, especially those of immigrant, low-income, and first-generation students and families, for equity in college and career pathways and for systemic change and adaptation.

中文翻译：

---

使用集成逻辑模型在学生的路径和系统变化中建立公平

摘要 本文报告了六个教育联盟如何开发集成逻辑模型的多案例研究，这是一种将多个项目的组成部分集成到单个逻辑模型模板中以将公平研究、实践和评估联系起来的新工具。这些联盟使用了三种相关策略：选择指向促进学生水平和系统公平的活动的理论和研究；将基于研究的活动与跨项目的成果联系起来；并跨项目合并学生级别的纵向数据。本文描述了六个联盟、他们使用集成逻辑模型所经历的好处和挑战，以及随着联盟开发其集成逻辑模型而对组织变革进行模式匹配分析的结果。我们的讨论将我们的发现与不断发展的关于资本的辩论联系起来，异化/归属感和挑战；一种新兴的共享语言；以及对研究、实践和评估的影响。这些突出了社区的文化资源，尤其是移民、低收入和第一代学生和家庭的文化资源，以促进大学和职业道路的公平以及系统性变革和适应。