ABSTRACT Tablets can be used to facilitate systematic testing of academic skills. Yet, when using validated paper tests on tablet, comparability between the mediums must be established. Comparability between a tablet and a paper version of a basic math skills test (HRT: Heidelberger Rechen Test 1–4) was investigated. Five samples with second and third grade students participated. The associations between the tablet and paper version of HRT showed that these modes of administration were comparable for three arithmetic scales, but unacceptable for a pictorial counting scale. Scores were lower on tablet. Test-retest reliability for arithmetic scales on tablet was satisfactory, but was inferior for a low-performing sample. The overall convergent validity was satisfactory. No effect of test administrator was found. Arithmetic scales can potentially be transferred to tablet with good comparability and maintained test-retest reliability. Precautions are necessary when transferring pictorial scales into tablet. Separate norms for tablet are needed when interpreting scores.

中文翻译：

---

平板电脑代替纸质测试适合年幼的孩子？海德堡Rechen测试1-4的纸版和平板电脑版本之间的可比性

摘要平板电脑可用于促进学术技能的系统测试。但是，当在平板电脑上使用经过验证的纸质测试时，必须建立媒体之间的可比性。研究了平板电脑和纸质版基本数学技能测试（HRT：Heidelberger Rechen测试1-4）之间的可比性。五个样本与二，三年级学生一起参加。平板电脑和纸质版HRT之间的关联表明，这些给药方式在三种算术量表上是可比的，但在图形计数表上是不可接受的。在平板电脑上分数较低。平板电脑上算术秤的重测信度令人满意，但对于性能低下的样品则较差。总体收敛效度令人满意。找不到测试管理员的效果。算术秤有可能以良好的可比性转移到平板电脑上，并保持重测的可靠性。将图形刻度转移到平板电脑时，必须采取预防措施。解释分数时，需要使用数位板的单独规范。