当前位置: X-MOL 学术Educational Assessment › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Introduction
Educational Assessment ( IF 2.1 ) Pub Date : 2020-01-02 , DOI: 10.1080/10627197.2019.1702466
Joan Herman 1 , Michael Kane 2
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT The introduction to the Special Issue on Validity Studies lays out the rationale and provides an overview of the four articles comprising the issue. Each of the articles focuses on the validation of a specific instrument for a given purpose. The set represents a range of assessment types and uses, including the assessment of reading strategy use, an observation measure of special education teachers, a next generation alternative assessment for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities, and a student self report survey to assess and respond to individual risks and needs that may lead to truancy and/or school failure, Each article presents a unique case of using evidence to support the argument that scores from a given instrument provide both intended inferences and valid information for a given purpose. The concluding commentary summarizes lessons learned and challenges remaining for the field.

中文翻译:

介绍

摘要有效性研究特刊的引言列出了理由,并概述了构成该问题的四篇文章。每篇文章都着眼于针对特定目的的特定工具的验证。该集合代表了一系列评估类型和用途,包括对阅读策略使用的评估,特殊教育教师的观察量度,针对认知能力最严重的学生的下一代替代评估,以及用于评估和评估学生自我报告的调查应对可能导致逃学和/或学校失败的个人风险和需求,每篇文章都提出了一个独特的案例,即使用证据来支持这样的论点,即给定工具的分数既可以提供预期的推论,又可以提供给定目的的有效信息。
更新日期:2020-01-02
down
wechat
bug