ABSTRACT International migration and tourism developed into cornerstones of modern societies and have many common features: they generally pass through the same routes, are served and controlled by similar actors, and often depend on each other as for instance with the prevalence of migrant labour in the tourism industry. Despite these entanglements which sometimes blur the lines between tourists and migrants, there has been very little scholarly attention aimed at connecting both fields, not least from a historical perspective. Using sources generated by the Foreigners Police, a body responsible for monitoring all non-nationals in Belgium and expelling ‘undesirables’, this article analyses how mobility controls addressing tourists and migrants evolved in Ostend, one of the most prominent European tourist resorts during the nineteenth century. This article tests how mobility controls in resorts deviated from national guidelines and explores whether security concerns about controlling foreigners weighed up against economic benefits derived from international mobility. How did authorities differentiate tourists from migrants and to what extent did mobility controls of migrants overlap and differ with those addressing tourists? By exploring the entanglements between mobility and migration controls the article seeks to encourage tourism and migration scholars to engage in broader debates.

中文翻译：

---

从海滨度假胜地到驱逐走廊：监测奥斯坦德外国人的入境、逗留和驱逐（1838-1914）

摘要 国际移民和旅游业发展成为现代社会的基石，具有许多共同特征：它们通常通过相同的路线，由相似的行为者提供服务和控制，并且经常相互依赖，例如移民劳工在社会中的盛行。旅游产业。尽管这些纠葛有时会模糊游客和移民之间的界限，但很少有学术关注旨在将这两个领域联系起来，尤其是从历史角度来看。使用外国人警察（一个负责监控比利时所有非国民并驱逐“不受欢迎的人”的机构）提供的资料，本文分析了在 19 世纪欧洲最著名的旅游胜地之一奥斯坦德，针对游客和移民的流动控制是如何演变的世纪。本文测试了度假村的流动性控制如何偏离国家指导方针，并探讨控制外国人的安全问题是否与国际流动性带来的经济利益相权衡。当局如何区分游客和移民，以及对移民的流动控制与针对游客的控制重叠和不同的程度如何？通过探索流动性和移民控制之间的纠葛，本文试图鼓励旅游和移民学者参与更广泛的辩论。当局如何区分游客和移民，以及对移民的流动控制与针对游客的控制重叠和不同的程度如何？通过探索流动性和移民控制之间的纠葛，本文试图鼓励旅游和移民学者参与更广泛的辩论。当局如何区分游客和移民，以及对移民的流动控制与针对游客的控制重叠和不同的程度如何？通过探索流动性和移民控制之间的纠葛，本文试图鼓励旅游和移民学者参与更广泛的辩论。