The emergence of COVID-19 as a global pandemic has necessitated the cooperation and collaboration of public health, public administration, and GIS professionals in order to keep the public informed and safe. This paper examines how these three professions’ code of ethics reinforce and conflict each other through a content analysis. A crosswalk is developed that identifies critical domains from all three codes of ethics, identifies keywords in these domains and identifies points of conflict and agreement. The crosswalk resolves conflicts and identifies an outcome unified code of ethics for application to COVID-19 data reporting. Observations grounded in each of the domains were then made of all state health department COVID-19 data reporting sites concluding that there were a number of ethical issues observed on the websites. The most frequent violations were found within domains where the ethical codes were divergent. The paper concludes with a proposed model for the future development of other unified codes of ethics for interprofessional collaboration.

COVID-19 作为全球大流行病的出现需要公共卫生、公共管理和 GIS 专业人员的合作与协作，以确保公众知情和安全。本文通过内容分析探讨了这三个职业的道德规范如何相互加强和相互冲突。开发了一个人行横道，从所有三个道德准则中识别关键领域，识别这些领域中的关键词，并识别冲突和一致点。人行横道解决了冲突并确定了适用于 COVID-19 数据报告的统一道德规范。然后对所有州卫生部门 COVID-19 数据报告网站进行了基于每个域的观察，得出结论认为在这些网站上观察到了许多道德问题。最常见的违规行为发生在道德规范存在分歧的领域内。本文最后提出了一个模型，用于未来发展跨专业合作的其他统一道德规范。