Dylann S. Roof, white supremacist perpetrator of the Charleston massacre (2015) resolved to dismiss his lawyers and to represent himself. In the course of the proceedings he wrote extensively, keeping notes and diaries, and also writing directly to the Court, in addition to engaging in a dialogue with the judge. Using Bourdieu on the concept of “force of law” and Foucault on the concept of order of discourse, this essay proposes that Roof reclaimed his autonomy as a subject by developing a rhetorical strategy of communication, and thus affirmed his own voice within the “game” of judicial exchanges and positions of power. This essay serves also as a building block to understand white nationalist or supremacist discursivity.

查尔斯顿大屠杀的白人至上主义肇事者Dylann S.Roof（2015年）决定解雇其律师并代表自己。在诉讼过程中，除了与法官对话外，他还撰写了大量文章，备有笔记和日记，还直接写信给法院。本文以布迪厄（Bourdieu）的“法律力量”概念和福柯（Foucault）的话语秩序概念为基础，提出屋顶通过制定一种修辞学的交流策略来收回他的自治作为主体，从而在“游戏”中肯定了自己的声音。司法交流和权力立场。本文也是了解白人民族主义者或至上主义者的话语性的基础。