ABSTRACT

This article analyses the link between Italian Autonomy, the Bolognese Movimento del ’77, and associated literary works: Enrico Palandri’s Boccalone and Andrea Pazienza’s Pentothal. Scholars have generally interpreted such works as venues for the expression of a fleeting moment of juvenile transgression, subsequently to be overcome. We contend instead that the work of Pazienza and Palandri can be viewed as evidence of the Autonomist project fuelling the Movement, as manifest in their concern with non-hierarchical forms of sociality free from the trappings of capitalism. This alternative politics emerges in the ‘adolescent tone’ adopted in Boccalone and Pentothal. We argue that, because adolescent writing hinges on (re-)creating communal spaces independent of adult power, these works should not be seen to mark an overcoming of the Movement’s collectivist politics, as scholarship to date has proposed, but as literary spaces that enable us to access the sociality of 1977 and its challenges.

摘要

这篇文章分析了意大利自治，博洛涅塞的Movimento del '77和相关文学作品之间的联系：恩里科·帕兰德里（Enrico Palandri）的Boccalone和安德里亚·帕齐恩扎（Andrea Pazienza）的Pentothal。学者们通常将这类作品解释为表达少年犯罪短暂时刻的场所，随后予以克服。我们反而认为，帕济恩扎和帕兰德里的工作可以看作是自治运动推动运动的证据，体现在他们对不受资本主义束缚的非等级社会形式的关注。这种替代政治出现在通过了“青少年音” Boccalone和喷妥撒。我们认为，由于青春期写作依赖于（重新）建立独立于成人权力的公共空间，因此这些作品不应被视为标志着运动的集体主义政治的克服，正如迄今为止的学术研究所建议的那样，而是被视为可以实现运动的文学空间。我们获得了1977年的社会性及其挑战。