ABSTRACT The purpose of this paper is to systematically review and trace the lineage of theoretical debates around social movement learning in the field of adult education. We compiled articles, books and conference proceedings on adult education and social movements from Google Scholar using the software Publish or Perish and manually filtered the data to only include those that explicitly address the topic. Based on the data, we identified key literature that scholars cross-referenced, which extended the review to include the literature from the 1970s until today. We argue that the theoretical debates about social movements and education can be characterised by four phases: 1) popular education within and for social movements, 2) the Old/New Social Movement debate and its radical influence on adult education, 3) conflict and pushback between scholars, and 4) social movement learning as a confluence of literature. We argue that it is only when scholars writing about popular education interacted with scholars promoting the idea of ‘new’ social movements that the current proliferation of ‘social movement learning’ emerged. Thus, the knowledge production of social movement learning itself has been a result of a dynamic and historical movement in the field of adult education.

中文翻译：

---

大众教育和社会运动研究对社会运动学习的融合：系统文献综述

摘要 本文的目的是系统地回顾和追溯成人教育领域围绕社会运动学习的理论争论的沿袭。我们使用 Publish 或 Perish 软件从 Google Scholar 中汇编了关于成人教育和社会运动的文章、书籍和会议记录，并手动过滤数据以仅包括那些明确涉及该主题的数据。根据数据，我们确定了学者交叉引用的关键文献，从而将综述扩展到包括 1970 年代至今的文献。我们认为，关于社会运动和教育的理论争论可以分为四个阶段：1）社会运动内部和社会运动的大众教育，2）旧/新社会运动争论及其对成人教育的激进影响，3) 学者之间的冲突和阻力，以及 4) 作为文学汇流的社会运动学习。我们认为，只有当撰写大众教育的学者与提倡“新”社会运动理念的学者互动时，才会出现当前“社会运动学习”的扩散。因此，社会运动学习本身的知识生产是成人教育领域动态和历史运动的结果。