Past research finds that Americans hold biased stereotypes about ethnoracial groups and about immigrants, but we lack an understanding of how these group identities intersect. Immigration theories offer opposing predictions; while the straight-line assimilation model predicts Americans will hold weaker ethnoracial stereotypes about the native-born compared to their immigrant coethnics, theories of racialized assimilation suggest that the enduring power of race will limit any differential stereotyping of immigrant and native-born members of racialized groups. I use an original survey experiment to compare Americans’ stereotypes of native- and foreign-born members of the four largest ethnoracial groups in the United States—Whites, Blacks, Latinos, and Asians. As predicted by straight-line assimilation theory, I find that Whites’ negative stereotypes of Latinos fade away with nativity; however, White Americans do not substantially alter their stereotypes of Asians and Blacks based on nativity status. Moreover, native-born Black and Latino Americans do not appear to hold differential stereotypes of ethnoracial groups based on their nativity status. This research highlights both the importance and limitations of accounting for nativity status to understand ethnoracial group boundaries in the United States.

中文翻译：

---

相交的边界：比较本土和外国出生的种族群体成员的刻板印象

过去的研究发现，美国人对种族群体和移民持有偏见的刻板印象，但我们缺乏对这些群体身份如何交叉的理解。移民理论提供了相反的预测；虽然直线同化模型预测，与移民同化相比，美国人对土生土长的种族刻板印象较弱，但种族同化理论表明，种族的持久力量将限制对移民和土生土长的种族化成员的任何不同刻板印象。团体。我使用原始调查实验来比较美国人对美国四大种族群体（白人、黑人、拉丁裔和亚洲人）的本土和外国出生成员的刻板印象。正如直线同化理论所预测的，我发现白人对拉丁裔的负面刻板印象随着耶稣诞生而逐渐消失。然而，美国白人并没有显着改变他们基于出生身份对亚洲人和黑人的刻板印象。此外，土生土长的黑人和拉丁裔美国人似乎并没有根据他们的出生身份对种族群体持有不同的刻板印象。这项研究强调了考虑出生状态以了解美国种族群体边界的重要性和局限性。