Why do women support social and economic arrangements that disadvantage them? System justification theory (SJT) proposes that an autonomous system-level motive is responsible for this tendency, beyond any group-interested considerations (e.g., hope of future group advancement). The social identity model of system attitudes (SIMSA) disputes the existence of a unique system-level motive and instead argues that hope of future group advancement can explain women's system-justifying attitudes. Meta-analyzed results from three experiments (Studies 1, N = 200; 2, N = 200; & 3, N = 700 women) revealed, consistent with SIMSA's social identity-based explanation, that strongly identified women supported socio-economic systems that historically favor men over women, mostly when they were hopeful about future gender equity. Contrary to SJT's system motive explanation, we did not find consistent evidence across the studies represented in our meta-analysis that women were more supportive of socio-economic realities that undercuts their group's interests when group motives were nonsalient.

中文翻译：

---

为什么女性支持更偏爱男性的社会经济体系？系统正当性和社会认同启发的希望解释的注册测试

为什么妇女支持对她们不利的社会和经济安排？系统正当性理论 (SJT) 提出，自主系统级动机是造成这种趋势的原因，超出了任何与群体利益相关的考虑因素（例如，未来群体进步的希望）。系统态度的社会认同模型（SIMSA）质疑独特的系统层面动机的存在，而是认为未来群体进步的希望可以解释女性的系统辩护态度。三个实验的荟萃分析结果（研究 1，N  = 200；2，N  = 200；和 3，N = 700 名女性）显示，与 SIMSA 基于社会认同的解释一致，女性强烈支持历史上偏爱男性而非女性的社会经济体系，主要是在她们对未来的性别平等抱有希望的情况下。与 SJT 的系统动机解释相反，在我们的荟萃分析中所代表的研究中，我们没有发现一致的证据表明，当群体动机不显着时，女性更支持削弱其群体利益的社会经济现实。