A discursive, always already Foucauldian approach to the law question has always seemed to me to suffice for critique to have the desired effect of successfully challenging law’s truth. But is it perhaps past time to move beyond discourse analysis and a purely visceral reaction to phallocratic law’s violence and towards what might be called an embodied feminist law agenda? The inquiry takes the form of a journey in search of new, more embodied ways of speaking out against violence against women. It has involved rethinking the relationship between mind and body and the presumptions about them that underlie fluctuations within feminist thought over time between emphasising discourse compared to emphasising bodies and how they impact on feminist praxis.

在我看来，对法律问题的一种散漫的、已经是福柯式的方法总是足以让批判产生成功挑战法律真理的预期效果。但是，超越话语分析和对阳具法的暴力的纯粹发自内心的反应，转向可能被称为体现的女权主义法律议程的时代是否已经过去了？调查采取了一种寻找新的、更具体的方式来反对暴力侵害妇女行为的旅程的形式。它涉及重新思考心灵和身体之间的关系以及关于它们的假设，这些假设是女权主义思想随着时间的推移在强调话语与强调身体之间的波动以及它们如何影响女权主义实践。