This paper explores self-plagiarism in three different articles that reported results of the same research project on reading in a foreign language. This article follows the qualitative research method and an exploratory case study was used. Results support that both inadequate paraphrasing and adequate paraphrasing were given. Regarding inadequate paraphrasing some similar words and ideas were found. On the other hand, using different authors in a specific idea, having different numbers of words in a common issue, and being versatile to present information might lead to adequate paraphrasing. Conclusions suggest that a dialog between editors and authors must be given in order to clear self-plagiarism up. Finally, conclusions also suggest that editors should consider the inclusion of some similar information in articles written by the same author or the same research members

中文翻译：

---

关于Self窃的反思

本文在三篇不同的文章中探讨了自我-窃，这些文章报道了同一研究项目在外语阅读方面的成果。本文遵循定性研究方法，并使用了探索性案例研究。结果支持给出了足够的释义和足够的释义。关于措辞不足，发现了一些类似的词和观点。另一方面，在一个特定的想法中使用不同的作者，在一个常见的问题中使用不同数量的单词，并且灵活地呈现信息可能会导致足够的措辞。结论表明，必须在编辑和作者之间进行对话，以消除self窃。最后，