Abstract Using data from Ithaka S + R US Faculty Survey 2015, the current study examined the influence of disciplinary differences and experience levels as well as their interactions on scholars’ attitudes toward print and electronic materials. While results of 3 × 5 factorial ANOVA procedure indicated both disciplinary membership and experience played a role in scholars’ attitudes, effect size indicated disciplinary membership played a more crucial role. Significant findings include rising popularity of electronic formats across examined groups.

中文翻译：

---

学科成员和该领域的经验对学者书籍和期刊格式偏好的影响

摘要 本研究使用 2015 年伊萨卡 S + R 美国教师调查的数据，检验了学科差异和经验水平的影响以及它们之间的相互作用对学者对印刷和电子材料的态度的影响。虽然 3 × 5 阶乘方差分析程序的结果表明学科成员和经验在学者态度中都发挥了作用，但效应大小表明学科成员发挥了更重要的作用。重要的发现包括电子格式在受检群体中的日益流行。