Abstract This paper examines the evolution of research paradigms in the history of ideas from the early twentieth century to the present, combing through the various changes which took place during this process of evolution. If the history of ideas as established by Arthur O. Lovejoy merely consists of research on basic “unit-ideas,” then the new history of ideas today is instead presented as shifting toward a focus on context, rhetoric, actions, and so on, with linguistic philosophy as its theoretical underpinnings; similarly, guided by an orientation toward social constructs, the “new sociocultural history” emphasizes the study of the relationship between ideas and social constructs. Echoing the march of globalization, the “spatial turn” has now emerged as well. In fact, regardless of the dimension of research, this has by no means resulted in a decline in research on the history of ideas, but has rather enriched its research paradigms, and expanded its field of vision. The new prosperity now welcomed in by the history of ideas after experiencing these shifts could thus perhaps be described as the resurgence and return of the study of the history of ideas.

中文翻译：

---

思想史的回归-关于思想史研究范式演变的观察

摘要本文考察了从二十世纪初期到现在的思想史上研究范式的演变，并结合了这一演变过程中发生的各种变化。如果亚瑟·奥·洛夫乔伊（Arthur O. Lovejoy）建立的思想史只包含对基本“单位思想”的研究，那么今天提出的新思想史将转向关注上下文，修辞，行为等，以语言哲学作为其理论基础；同样，在社会建构取向的指导下，“新的社会文化史”强调研究思想与社会建构之间的关系。伴随着全球化的步伐，“空间转向”也已经出现。实际上，无论研究的范围如何，这绝不会导致思想史研究的下降，反而丰富了其研究范式，并扩大了其视野。在经历了这些转变之后，思想史所欢迎的新繁荣因此可以被描述为思想史研究的复兴和回归。