metadata schemas provide a useful overview. The discussion of the roles of taxonomies and folksonomies for the management of different resource types, including social media, will benefit any information professional trying to understand the requirements for individual metadata elements. Issues surrounding the management of ‘big data’ and the management of research data are also given significant coverage. It was fitting, I believe, to conclude the book with a chapter on the politics and ethics of metadata. With changes to Data Protection legislation, the ever-present Freedom of Information Act and the growing importance of human rights and ethical discussions in the field of data management, it was important to reflect on these issues as well as the importance of making sure our data is secure. Information and data inequality are also considered. This final chapter re-assesses the role of metadata now and in the future and discusses the importance of a planned workflow for metadata management. Haynes concludes with a discussion of the inevitable power dynamics that exist when dealing with the management of metadata and issues the following rallying cry for future information professionals:

中文翻译：

---

数字策展项目变得简单：图书馆、档案馆和博物馆的分步指南，

元数据模式提供了有用的概述。分类法和民间分类法在不同资源类型（包括社交媒体）管理中的作用的讨论，将使任何试图了解各个元数据元素要求的信息专业人员受益。围绕“大数据”管理和研究数据管理的问题也得到了大量报道。我相信，用一章关于元数据的政治和伦理的章节来结束本书是合适的。随着数据保护立法的变化、始终存在的信息自由法以及数据管理领域人权和道德讨论的日益重要，重要的是要反思这些问题以及确保我们的数据的重要性是安全的。信息和数据不平等也被考虑在内。最后一章重新评估了元数据现在和未来的作用，并讨论了元数据管理计划工作流程的重要性。海恩斯最后讨论了在处理元数据管理时不可避免的权力动态，并为未来的信息专业人员发出了以下号召：