Abstract In order to consider how to negotiate the publication space of interdisciplinary research in architecture in academic journals, this essay reflects on the current forms of writing in architectural discourse, the history of a “critique militante” architectural (peer) review process within the academy, and the future possibilities of a feminist oriented process that seeks to accommodate otherness. These reflections emerge from our experience as academics and as women editors of the interdisciplinary, multimedia journal, Architecture and Culture, first published in 2013. The essay argues that peer review for interdisciplinary research in architecture needs to be re-negotiated as publishing tolerance through a contingency approach to evaluation. We conclude that academic architectural journal publishing can flourish through broader conversational modes of open, non-hierarchical knowledge exchange and editorial practice where published work undergoes a process of becoming.

中文翻译：

---

建筑期刊出版跨学科研究同行评审的容忍度

摘要 为了考虑如何在学术期刊上协商建筑学跨学科研究的出版空间，本文反思了建筑话语中当前的写作形式，学院内“批判军事”建筑（同行）审查过程的历史。 ，以及寻求适应其他性的女权主义过程的未来可能性。这些反思来自于我们作为学者和跨学科多媒体期刊“建筑与文化”的女性编辑的经历，该杂志于 2013 年首次出版。这篇文章认为，需要重新谈判建筑跨学科研究的同行评审，因为通过评估的应急方法。