This article examines and evaluates Feminist Judgments of Aotearoa New Zealand, Te Rino: A Two Stranded Rope, the latest published book in the growing collection of global feminist judgments projects. Feminist judgments projects are exploding across the globe, with completed projects in Canada, England, Australia, the United States and Ireland, an international law feminist judgments project well under way, and projects in Scotland, India, Mexico and Africa in process. In the US, a series of subject-matter specific feminist judgment books is in progress, the first volume of which has already been published. The participants in these projects have asked what difference a judge with a feminist perspective could have made in the reasoning or result in a case, and then attempted to show, through the writing of ‘shadow opinions,’ what that judgment might look like. Through the lens of Feminist Judgments: Te Rino, this article, written by the editors of the US feminist judgments book, explores and compares how the various international feminist judgments projects have taken on the enduring jurisprudential question of how much a judge’s individual perspective matters in decision making.

中文翻译：

---

多股女性主义司法观点的必要性

本文研究和评估了新西兰奥特罗阿的女权主义判决，《 Te Rino：两股绳索》，这是全球女权主义判决项目日益增多的最新出版书籍。女权主义判决项目正在全球范围内激增，在加拿大，英国，澳大利亚，美国和爱尔兰的已完成项目，一项国际法女权主义判决项目正在进行中，而在苏格兰，印度，墨西哥和非洲的项目正在进行中。在美国，一系列针对特定主题的女权主义判断书籍正在开发中，其第一卷已经出版。这些项目的参与者询问了具有女权主义观点的法官在推理或结果上可能有什么区别，然后试图通过撰写“影子意见”来表明，该判断可能是什么样的。本文通过女性主义判决书：蒂里诺（Te Rino）的镜头，由美国女性主义判决书的编辑撰写，探讨并比较了各种国际女性主义判决项目对法官的个人观点有多重要的持久法学问题采取的态度。决策。