ABSTRACT In Patterns of Democracy (Second Edition, Yale University Press, 2012), Arend Lijphart offered eight forms of government-one parliamentary, one presidential and six possible hybrids. He deemed Types IV and VI problematic because a legislative vote of no confidence in the popularly elected executive would be seen as defiance of the popular will. He felt that these two would be acceptable if the no-confidence motion permitted the executive to dissolve the legislature. In 1980, Guyana created an executive presidency elected directly by the population and since 2000 removable by a parliamentary vote of no confidence which now satisfies Lijphart's Hybrid VI.

中文翻译：

---

纠正 Arend Lijphart 的混合 VI：圭亚那案例

摘要 在《民主模式》（第二版，耶鲁大学出版社，2012 年）中，Arend Lijphart 提供了八种政府形式——一种议会制、一种总统制和六种可能的混合政体。他认为第四类和第六类有问题，因为对民选行政部门的不信任投票将被视为对民意的蔑视。他认为，如果不信任动议允许行政部门解散立法机关，那么这两个是可以接受的。1980 年，圭亚那设立了一个由民众直接选举产生的行政总统职位，自 2000 年以来，通过议会不信任投票可罢免，现在​​满足 Lijphart 的混合 VI。