Abstract This commentary urges legal pluralism research to go beyond mere constative statements and to apply a praxeological approach which asks how legal pluralism is brought into existence and what effects it produces. A methodological move from micro-analytics via object-centred analytics to some form of methodological holism is proposed in order to study how a certain object (here: assisted suicide) is being trans-sequentially compiled and transformed within the material, discursive, epistemic apparatuses (including those of a state) of plural legal orders.

中文翻译：

---

评论：对多元法律秩序的跨序分析：对“不确定状态”的一些思考

摘要 该评论敦促法律多元化研究超越单纯的陈述性陈述，并应用一种行为学方法，询问法律多元化是如何产生的及其产生的影响。提出了从微观分析通过以对象为中心的分析到某种形式的方法论整体论的方法论转变，以研究某个对象（此处：辅助自杀）如何在材料、话语、认知装置中被跨顺序地编译和转换（包括国家的）复数法律秩序。