ABSTRACT Migration is a topic that has frequently been present in political debates and the mass media in recent years, especially following the European and EU migration and refugee crisis. Newspaper debates in Norway presented different narratives with different conceptions of global justice. Migration is by definition a cross-border issue that has a direct effect on the interests of states as well as individuals, therefore the question of global justice is highly relevant. Three core media narratives were present: the humanitarian, the statist, and the EU integration narrative, which particularly highlights Norway as an integrated non-member of the EU. In the humanitarian narrative, a notion of impartiality of universal individual rights was prevalent, while in the statist narrative and to some extent in the EU integration narrative, a territorial and state-oriented conception of justice as non-domination was visible. Concerns about human rights were prevalent mainly in matters far away from Norway, but less so when the so-called migration crisis hit Norway directly.

中文翻译：

---

从人道主义需求到边境控制：挪威媒体对移民和正义观念的叙述

摘要 移民是近年来政治辩论和大众媒体中经常出现的一个话题，尤其是在欧洲和欧盟的移民和难民危机之后。挪威的报纸辩论以不同的全球正义概念呈现了不同的叙述。根据定义，移民是一个跨境问题，直接影响国家和个人的利益，因此全球正义问题具有高度相关性。存在三种核心媒体叙事：人道主义、国家主义和欧盟一体化叙事，特别强调挪威是一个一体化的非欧盟成员国。在人道主义叙事中，普遍个人权利的公正性概念盛行，而在国家主义叙事中，在某种程度上，在欧盟一体化叙事中，作为非支配性的以领土和国家为导向的正义观念是显而易见的。对人权的担忧主要发生在远离挪威的事情上，但当所谓的移民危机直接袭击挪威时，这种担忧就不那么普遍了。