ABSTRACT In the last few years, migration has been at the centre of attention of the European public and policymakers, sparking an unprecedented debate on responsibilities and rights. This Special Issue presents a collection of European case studies analysing narratives of migration and their embedded justice claims. It focuses on the way national newspapers have covered and discussed key political events related to European politics and migration dynamics between 2014 and 2018. The results reveal an increasing normalisation of extreme and anti-immigrant claims in all cases. The only rather frequent counter-narrative is ‘humanitarian’, yet, it predominantly depicts migrants as victims, hence denying their subjectivity and actorness. There is an important correlation between the debates on migration and the European Union, as the so-called ‘crisis’ has strengthened the political debate on the EU in European countries. All in all, the dominant narratives on migration embed a Westphalian understanding of justice (justice as non-domination), while little attention is devoted to cosmopolitan justice claims (justice ad impartiality) and, much less, to ‘subjectivised cosmopolitan justice claims’ (justice as mutual recognition).

中文翻译：

---

谈论移民：欧洲移民治理体系中的移民叙事和司法诉求

摘要 在过去的几年里，移民一直是欧洲公众和政策制定者关注的焦点，引发了一场关于责任和权利的空前辩论。本期特刊展示了一系列欧洲案例研究，分析了移民叙事及其嵌入的正义主张。它侧重于全国性报纸在 2014 年至 2018 年期间报道和讨论与欧洲政治和移民动态相关的关键政治事件的方式。结果显示，在所有情况下，极端和反移民索赔都在日益正常化。唯一相当频繁的反叙事是“人道主义”，然而，它主要将移民描述为受害者，因此否认他们的主观性和行为性。关于移民的辩论与欧盟之间存在重要的关联，由于所谓的“危机”加剧了欧洲国家关于欧盟的政治辩论。总而言之，关于移民的主流叙事嵌入了威斯特伐利亚对正义的理解（作为非统治的正义），而很少关注世界性的正义主张（公正和公正），更不用说“主观化的世界性正义主张”了（作为相互承认的正义）。