ABSTRACT Syria is generally considered a case of non-intervention. One of the dominant (since the 1990s) kinds of intervention, namely multilateral humanitarian intervention, failed, as did other attempts by a select group of countries to implement a ‘red line’ concerning the use of chemical weapons. However, in this case, there is no sharp dichotomy between intervention and non-intervention. In lieu of an intervention that would tilt the balance and coordinate help to halt massacres, various rival and uncoordinated international and regional interventions overlapped over time, fuelling a market for violence. ‘Weakened interventionism’, as opposed to principled and hierarchical intervention, has manifested itself in Syria in a model recalling “the struggle for Syria” of the 1960s in a new, contemporary setting.

中文翻译：

---

重新开始的“叙利亚之战”：从“叙利亚”战争到“叙利亚”战争

摘要 叙利亚通常被认为是一个不干预的案例。一种主要的（自 1990 年代以来）干预，即多边人道主义干预，失败了，一些国家试图实施关于使用化学武器的“红线”也失败了。然而，在这种情况下，干预和不干预之间没有明显的二分法。代替将倾斜平衡和协调帮助制止屠杀的干预，随着时间的推移，各种相互竞争和不协调的国际和区域干预相互重叠，助长了暴力市场。与原则性和等级式干预相反，“削弱的干预主义”在叙利亚以一种在新的当代环境中回顾 1960 年代“叙利亚斗争”的模式表现出来。