当前位置: X-MOL 学术The International Spectator › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The Renewed ‘Struggle for Syria’: From the War ‘in’ Syria to the War ‘over’ Syria
The International Spectator ( IF 1.6 ) Pub Date : 2020-07-02 , DOI: 10.1080/03932729.2020.1796007
Philippe Droz-Vincent 1
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT Syria is generally considered a case of non-intervention. One of the dominant (since the 1990s) kinds of intervention, namely multilateral humanitarian intervention, failed, as did other attempts by a select group of countries to implement a ‘red line’ concerning the use of chemical weapons. However, in this case, there is no sharp dichotomy between intervention and non-intervention. In lieu of an intervention that would tilt the balance and coordinate help to halt massacres, various rival and uncoordinated international and regional interventions overlapped over time, fuelling a market for violence. ‘Weakened interventionism’, as opposed to principled and hierarchical intervention, has manifested itself in Syria in a model recalling “the struggle for Syria” of the 1960s in a new, contemporary setting.

中文翻译:

重新开始的“叙利亚之战”:从“叙利亚”战争到“叙利亚”战争

摘要 叙利亚通常被认为是一个不干预的案例。一种主要的(自 1990 年代以来)干预,即多边人道主义干预,失败了,一些国家试图实施关于使用化学武器的“红线”也失败了。然而,在这种情况下,干预和不干预之间没有明显的二分法。代替将倾斜平衡和协调帮助制止屠杀的干预,随着时间的推移,各种相互竞争和不协调的国际和区域干预相互重叠,助长了暴力市场。与原则性和等级式干预相反,“削弱的干预主义”在叙利亚以一种在新的当代环境中回顾 1960 年代“叙利亚斗争”的模式表现出来。
更新日期:2020-07-02
down
wechat
bug