help appreciate the distinctiveness of the IAOS approach. There are allusions to international experience, such as the example of Myanmar (2–3), but an international comparative approach could be drawn on in more detail; for example, comparison with the experiences of cooperatives in wider European contexts, such as Austro-Hungary, and their politicisation there. Overall, Doyle’s monograph is well researched and is a valuable contribution to the historiography of an underexplored avenue of Irish history and will prove a valuable resource to future scholars.

中文翻译：

---

爱尔兰的新教民族主义者，1900-1923

帮助理解 IAOS 方法的独特性。有国际经验的典故，例如缅甸的例子（2-3），但可以更详细地借鉴国际比较方法；例如，与更广泛的欧洲环境中合作社的经验进行比较，例如奥匈帝国，以及它们在那里的政治化。总体而言，Doyle 的专着得到了充分研究，对爱尔兰历史上一条未被充分探索的道路的史学做出了宝贵贡献，并将成为未来学者的宝贵资源。