ABSTRACT This article proposes a posthumanist reading of knowledge in Zhuangzi and Jacques Lacan from four interconnected aspects. First, knowledge is inseparable from practice, as is exemplified in Lacan’s original rewriting of Zhuangzi’s ‘agreement between name and actuality’ as the dialectic relationship between Other and other. Then, knowledge leads us to explore the mysterious knowledge behind the surface, which resists linguistic expression and defies human agency. Furthermore, the importance of the mysterious knowledge compels us to figure out the accesses to reach this unknown territory. Finally, the availability of the opaque knowledge, in a circular form, returns to the beginning question albeit on a more advanced level: the methods of putting the unknown knowledge into practice. Apart from these four logical aspects, the new perspective of posthumanism enables us to go beyond anthropocentric understanding of knowledge and bracket it within a broad framework of cross-species becoming.

中文翻译：

---

对庄子和雅克·拉康的后人文主义知识解读

摘要本文从四个相互联系的方面提出了后人主义的对庄子和雅克·拉康知识的解读。首先，知识与实践是分不开的，正如拉康最初将庄子的“名与实之间的协议”重写为他人与他人之间的辩证关系所体现的那样。然后，知识引导我们探索表面之下的神秘知识，该知识抵制语言表达并无视人类的代理能力。此外，神秘知识的重要性迫使我们找出到达这个未知领域的途径。最后，不透明知识以循环形式的可用性，尽管在更高级的层面上，还是回到了最初的问题：将未知知识付诸实践的方法。除了这四个逻辑方面，