Abstract Vital non-human things are too easily severed from their human “owners” due, in part, to particular human rights logics that enact market logics of equivalence, multicultural investments in recognition, settler-colonial categories of life and death, and Westphalian notions of racial identity. Using the controversial sale of Native artifacts as our primary example, and borrowing from recent thought on temporality and liveliness in feminist physics, we consider how a rethinking (not just expansion) of the subject of human rights opens up possibilities beyond the rights to development, enshrined in the 2007 U.N. Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, and towards something like rights of relationality. We turn to the contemporary photoart of Annu Palakunnathu Matthew to explore sovereignty and solidarity across NDN/Indian divides.

中文翻译：

---

事物的生命：本土物品、人权和印度与印度的关系

摘要 重要的非人类事物很容易与它们的人类“所有者”分离，部分原因是特定的人权逻辑制定了对等的市场逻辑、多元文化的承认投资、殖民者的生死分类以及威斯特伐利亚的概念。种族认同。以有争议的本土文物出售作为我们的主要例子，并借用最近关于女权主义物理学中的时间性和活力的思想，我们考虑了对人权主题的重新思考（不仅仅是扩展）如何开辟超越发展权的可能性， 2007 年《联合国土著人民权利宣言》，并朝着诸如关系权利之类的方向发展。我们转向 Annu Palakunnathu Matthew 的当代摄影艺术，探索跨越 NDN/印度分歧的主权和团结。