Constitutivists about moral norms are often suspected of providing an overly “self-centered” account of morality which does not take seriously enough morality’s interpersonal nature. This worry seems particularly pressing in the light of recent debates about the relational character of many moral norms. In this paper, I discuss one aspect of this worry, which concerns the special standing to complain which the victims of wrongdoing have. I argue that, contrary to appearances, Kantian constitutivism can explain this latter feature, since there is a special need for remedying the denial of equal moral standing of the victim and the impairment of the victim’s agency which any wrongdoing involves.

中文翻译：

---

谴责宪政者：康德宪政主义和受害者的特殊地位

关于道德规范的宪法主义者常常被怀疑提供了过于“以自我为中心”的道德解释，而这种解释并没有足够重视道德的人际关系性质。鉴于最近有关许多道德规范的关系特征的辩论，这种担忧似乎尤为紧迫。在本文中，我讨论了这种担忧的一个方面，即与不法行为的受害者所拥有的特殊抱怨地位有关。我认为，与表象相反，康德式的宪政主义可以解释后者的特征，因为特别需要纠正被剥夺受害者平等的道德地位以及任何不法行为所造成的损害受害者代理人的行为。