ABSTRACT Persons are inter-personally congruent to the extent that their behavior is consistent with their social contracts with others. This view is contrary to Rogers’ intra-personal view of congruence, which holds that a person is congruent to the extent that there is no discrepancy between ‘the self as perceived and the actual experience of the organism’. The differences in the social contracts of these two perspectives are spelled out in considerable detail in the context of client-centered, person-centered and relational depth therapies. The paper also discusses the complexity in establishing mutually satisfying social contracts, and, in that light, presents a client-centered therapy transcript of a father and daughter who have very different notions of what constitutes a father/daughter social contract. The transcript and commentary show that the client-centered therapeutic relationship is no less deep than other therapeutic relationships that emphasize their depth, no less collaborative than other non-coercive therapies that emphasize the extent of their collaboration, and no less authentic than therapies that underline the alleged authenticity of the therapist.

中文翻译：

---

人际一致性：以来访者为中心和以人为中心的治疗的社会契约

摘要 人在人际上是一致的，因为他们的行为与他们与他人的社会契约一致。这种观点与罗杰斯的个人内部一致性观点相反，该观点认为一个人在“感知的自我与有机体的实际体验之间没有差异”的程度上是一致的。在以客户为中心、以人为中心和关系深度疗法的背景下，这两种观点的社会契约差异得到了相当详细的阐述。该论文还讨论了建立相互满意的社会契约的复杂性，并在此基础上提出了以来访者为中心的治疗记录，父女对父女社会契约的构成有着截然不同的概念。