This editorial is written at a time unlike any other, towards the end of the first wave of the Covid-19 global pandemic, and in the middle of a worldwide response to structural racism sparked by the death of George Floyd in the United States. There is no doubt that over the next months and years, we will see our literature expand in relation to what these events mean, and what their implications might be for psychoanalytic clinical theory and practice with children and young people, parents and families. Apart from the research digest that helpfully draws together abstracts relating to telephone and video therapy, the papers and articles in this journal emerged from a time before the current struggles and preoccupations. In their breadth and range of interest, however, they highlight how our community of practice has been able to respond with flexibility and interest to the challenges of what we are all facing globally as human beings and as psychoanalytic practitioners. What comes across from the work in this edition is the curiosity, readiness to explore, and depth of engagement that are alive in the minds of those who work psychoanalytically with children; these papers illustrate some of the different places towards which that instinct to understand more has been directed. The first group of articles in the journal are full-length papers with a particular area of interest under examination. A foundation of our psychoanalytic work is our own experience of being a patient; the first paper by Coralie Lasvergnas-Garcia has this experience as a focus, asking important questions and exploring themes that may encourage further debate and discussion regarding analytic treatment during training. Next, Deborah Marks looks at the centrality of work with parents as another foundation in the frame, allowing and supporting the work undertaken with children. Crasnow et al. provide an account from the practitioners’ perspectives of work with parents in a homeless hostel, part of a strong tradition across the child psychotherapy profession and pre-clinical workforce in making use of a psychoanalytic framework to inform working relationships. Jenkins et al. also present a way of working in a setting outside the clinical environment, with an account that adds to the growing literature on clinical practice in educational settings, with communities who might otherwise be excluded from access to treatment. Angela Evans’s paper on the ‘taboo of love’ for children in care builds on the literature that is so central to practice for many child psychotherapists working with children in the care system, and with the carers and networks around them, looking at some individual case material. Then follows Joshua Durban’s paper, which involves a closely tracked account of the treatment and thinking in relation to an autistic patient, with a special focus on sensory-perceptual fragmentation. At the Journal we are interested in encouraging discourse and debate, and are pleased to include a brief commentary response to the recent paper by Grossfeld JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOTHERAPY 2020, VOL. 46, NO. 1, 1–2 https://doi.org/10.1080/0075417X.2020.1782452

中文翻译：

---

社论

这篇社论是在与任何其他人不同的时间写成的，在第一波 Covid-19 全球大流行即将结束之际，正值全球对乔治·弗洛伊德 (George Floyd) 在美国之死引发的结构性种族主义做出反应之际。毫无疑问，在接下来的几个月和几年里，我们将看到我们的文献扩展到这些事件的含义，以及它们对儿童和年轻人、父母和家庭的精神分析临床理论和实践的影响。除了有助于汇集与电话和视频治疗相关的摘要的研究文摘外，该期刊中的论文和文章出现在当前的斗争和关注之前。然而，在他们感兴趣的广度和范围内，他们强调了我们的实践社区如何能够灵活和感兴趣地应对我们作为人类和精神分析从业者在全球范围内面临的挑战。这一版的作品所传达的是好奇心、探索意愿和参与深度，这些都活跃在那些与儿童一起进行精神分析工作的人的脑海中；这些论文说明了理解更多的本能所指向的一些不同的地方。期刊中的第一组文章是长篇论文，其中包含正在审查的特定领域。我们精神分析工作的基础是我们自己作为病人的经历；Coralie Lasvergnas-Garcia 的第一篇论文以这种经验为重点，在培训期间提出重要问题并探索可能鼓励进一步辩论和讨论的主题。接下来，黛博拉·马克斯 (Deborah Marks) 将与父母一起工作的核心视为框架中的另一个基础，允许并支持与孩子一起进行的工作。克拉斯诺等人。从从业者的角度介绍在无家可归者宿舍与父母一起工作的情况，这是儿童心理治疗专业和临床前劳动力利用精神分析框架来告知工作关系的强大传统的一部分。詹金斯等人。还介绍了一种在临床环境之外的环境中工作的方式，其帐户增加了教育环境中越来越多的临床实践文献，否则社区可能会被排除在获得治疗之外。安吉拉·埃文斯 (Angela Evans) 关于受照料儿童的“爱的禁忌”的论文建立在文献的基础之上，该文献对许多在照料系统中与儿童一起工作的儿童心理治疗师以及他们周围的照料者和网络进行实践至关重要，并着眼于一些个别案例材料。然后是约书亚·德班 (Joshua Durban) 的论文，该论文涉及对与自闭症患者相关的治疗和思考的密切跟踪记录，特别关注感官感知碎片化。在杂志上，我们有兴趣鼓励讨论和辩论，并很高兴对格罗斯菲尔德儿童心理治疗杂志 2020 年卷的最近论文做出简短评论回应。46，没有。1, 1–2 https://doi.org/10.1080/0075417X.2020.1782452 并与他们周围的护理人员和网络一起，查看一些个别案例材料。然后是约书亚·德班 (Joshua Durban) 的论文，该论文涉及对与自闭症患者相关的治疗和思考的密切跟踪记录，特别关注感官知觉碎片化。在杂志上，我们有兴趣鼓励讨论和辩论，并很高兴对格罗斯菲尔德儿童心理治疗杂志 2020 年卷最近的论文做出简短的评论回应。46，没有。1, 1–2 https://doi.org/10.1080/0075417X.2020.1782452 并与他们周围的护理人员和网络一起，查看一些个别案例材料。然后是约书亚·德班 (Joshua Durban) 的论文，该论文涉及对与自闭症患者相关的治疗和思考的密切跟踪记录，特别关注感官知觉碎片化。在杂志上，我们有兴趣鼓励讨论和辩论，并很高兴对格罗斯菲尔德儿童心理治疗杂志 2020 年卷的最近论文做出简短评论回应。46，没有。1, 1–2 https://doi.org/10.1080/0075417X.2020.1782452 在杂志上，我们有兴趣鼓励讨论和辩论，并很高兴对格罗斯菲尔德儿童心理治疗杂志 2020 年卷的最近论文做出简短评论回应。46，没有。1, 1–2 https://doi.org/10.1080/0075417X.2020.1782452 在杂志上，我们有兴趣鼓励讨论和辩论，并很高兴对格罗斯菲尔德儿童心理治疗杂志 2020 年卷的最近论文做出简短评论回应。46，没有。1, 1–2 https://doi.org/10.1080/0075417X.2020.1782452