ABSTRACT Contemporary social science philosophy is bedevilled with debates about the nature of knowledge production. This article introduces the philosophical notion of interiority whereby, by focusing on the operations of knowledge production in the human mind, OD scholars and researchers can ground Modes 1 and 2 in a bigger picture of what is common to all research. This perspective which recognizes different ways of knowing in different situations cuts through the polarized differences between Modes 1 and 2. Rather than looking at what is different between them this article explores their complementarity through an interiority-based OD research framework. MAD statement This article focuses on how knowledge is produced in the field of organization development (OD). Mode 1 produces knowledge in a disciplinary context and aims at producing scientific knowledge. Mode 2 focuses on creating knowledge for practical use through a partnership between researchers and practitioners. Both modes are valuable for managers and OD practitioners for how they contribute to knowledge production. A comprehensive framework based on six macrophases in OD knowledge production is advanced by focusing on kind of knowledge that is needed for what purpose (an activity of the human mind which we call interiority).

中文翻译：

---

组织发展中的知识生产：基于内部性的视角

摘要当代社会科学哲学被关于知识生产本质的辩论所困扰。本文介绍了内部性的哲学概念，通过关注内部思想的知识生产操作，OD学者和研究人员可以将模式1和2放到所有研究的共同点上。这种认识到在不同情况下的不同认识方式的观点，消除了模式1和模式2之间的两极分化差异。与其通过研究基于内部性的OD研究框架来探讨它们之间的互补性，不在于研究它们之间的区别。MAD声明本文重点介绍如何在组织发展（OD）领域中产生知识。模式1在学科背景下产生知识，旨在产生科学知识。模式2的重点是通过研究人员和从业人员之间的合作来创建实用知识。两种模式对于管理人员和外勤从业人员在知识创造方面的贡献都是有价值的。通过集中于实现什么目的（人类心灵的活动，我们称为内在性）所需的知识种类，可以提高基于OD知识生产的六个宏观阶段的综合框架。