Abstract Prior research into the role of business librarians in academic program reviews has relied on surveys and interviews, revealing that librarians perceive that they are marginalized in the review process. Using a collection of program review documentation produced for the reviews of nine graduate programs offered at a Canadian business school, this study employs corpus-based techniques to obtain direct measures of librarian involvement. The findings provide objective confirmation that business librarians are not well integrated into program reviews overall, and that their contribution to the reviews of professional programs is even more limited than their contribution to the reviews of research-oriented programs. Based on best practices and missed opportunities observed as part of this study, seven strategies are suggested for integrating business librarians more fully in the program review process for the benefit of all program stakeholders.

中文翻译：

---

使用基于语料库的方法调查商业图书馆员在学术项目审查中的参与

摘要 先前对商业图书馆员在学术项目评审中的作用的研究依赖于调查和访谈，表明图书馆员认为他们在评审过程中被边缘化。本研究使用为一所加拿大商学院提供的九个研究生课程的审查而生成的计划审查文件集，采用基于语料库的技术来获得图书馆员参与的直接衡量标准。调查结果客观地证实了商业图书馆员没有很好地融入整体项目评审中，他们对专业项目评审的贡献甚至比他们对研究型项目评审的贡献更为有限。根据本研究中观察到的最佳实践和错失的机会，