Abstract Some recent studies suggest that lesbians, gay men, and bisexual people are generally more racially progressive than heterosexuals. However, the findings of these “political distinctiveness” studies are up for some debate. Other studies find no sexuality gaps in racial attitudes, and these studies overlook the possibility of bisexual people having unique racial perspectives. These distinctiveness studies also ignore the possibility of racial and sexual identities influencing racial attitudes at the same time. In using the American National Election Survey of 2016 as a data source (N = 3,987), this work found limited and conditional support for a sexuality gap in racial attitudes. In most cases, heterosexual people and sexual minorities converge in their racial interpretations, but there are some cases of stark differences between heterosexual individuals and lesbian-gay counterparts. Finally, an analysis of intersecting identities displayed some instances where the impact of a sexual identity varied by a person’s racial background. For example, Black and Latinx bisexual people did not perceive racism or internalize racial stereotypes at especially high levels, but Latinx bisexual individuals were more supportive of Black protests against the police than Black bisexual individuals.

中文翻译：

---

黑人、拉丁裔和白人个体的性身份和种族态度

摘要 最近的一些研究表明，女同性恋者、男同性恋者和双性恋者通常比异性恋者在种族上更加进步。然而，这些“政治独特性”研究的结果值得商榷。其他研究发现种族态度没有性别差异，这些研究忽略了双性恋者具有独特种族观点的可能性。这些独特性研究也忽略了种族和性别认同同时影响种族态度的可能性。在使用 2016 年美国全国选举调查作为数据源（N = 3,987）时，这项工作发现对种族态度中的性别差距的支持有限且有条件。在大多数情况下，异性恋者和性少数群体在他们的种族解释上趋于一致，但在某些情况下，异性恋者和同性恋者之间存在明显差异。最后，对交叉身份的分析显示了一些实例，其中性身份的影响因一个人的种族背景而异。例如，黑人和拉丁裔双性恋者并没有在特别高的水平上感知种族主义或内化种族刻板印象，但拉丁裔双性恋者比黑人双性恋者更支持黑人抗议警察。