ABSTRACT There are many different ways of heating in historic houses – radiative, air, or convective heating, high- and low-temperature systems, local and area heating. Four different heating systems with high suitability for historic buildings were chosen and compared in long-term measurement campaigns. Two low-temperature area wall heating systems – prefabricated clay elements with serial pipes as well as a wall heating system with parallel pipes – were installed and two radiative high-temperature systems – a radiative plate heater and a Temperierung system that heats the base of the wall. While these systems were installed in four nearly identic rooms, indoor climate and energy monitoring has shown the difficulties with a direct comparison. This also shows the special problems when dealing with comparative measurements in historic buildings with their often unknown wall constructions. In the end, all four systems were compared to a reference system (a convective electric heater) room by room. For the specific examined case at Benediktbeuern, both low-temperature area wall heating systems and the radiant heater showed similar energy demand like the convective system. The high-temperature Temperierung heating system had an about 1.5 times higher energy demand. All wall heating systems were favourable in terms of comfort and preventing damp damages.

中文翻译：

---

历史古迹中不同墙壁供暖系统的评估——能源和保护方面

摘要 历史悠久的房屋有多种不同的供暖方式——辐射供暖、空气供暖或对流供暖、高温和低温系统、局部和区域供暖。在长期测量活动中选择并比较了四种对历史建筑高度适用的不同供暖系统。安装了两个低温区域墙体加热系统 - 带有串联管道的预制粘土元件以及带有平行管道的壁面加热系统 - 和两个辐射高温系统 - 一个辐射板式加热器和一个加热系统底部的 Temperierung 系统墙。虽然这些系统安装在四个几乎相同的房间中，但通过直接比较，室内气候和能源监测显示出了困难。这也显示了在处理具有通常未知墙壁结构的历史建筑的比较测量时的特殊问题。最后，将所有四个系统逐个房间与参考系统（对流电加热器）进行比较。对于 Benediktbeuern 的具体检查案例，低温区域壁面加热系统和辐射加热器显示出与对流系统类似的能量需求。高温 Temperierung 加热系统的能源需求高出约 1.5 倍。在舒适性和防止受潮损害方面，所有壁式供暖系统都是有利的。低温区域壁面加热系统和辐射加热器都显示出与对流系统相似的能量需求。高温 Temperierung 加热系统的能源需求高出约 1.5 倍。在舒适性和防止受潮损害方面，所有壁式供暖系统都是有利的。低温区域壁面加热系统和辐射加热器都显示出与对流系统相似的能量需求。高温 Temperierung 加热系统的能源需求高出约 1.5 倍。在舒适性和防止受潮损害方面，所有壁式供暖系统都是有利的。