ABSTRACT Architectural programming in the US has evolved from a methodology developed in the mid-twentieth century and canonized in the 1969 publication (with four subsequent editions), Problem Seeking, An Architectural Programming Primer by William M. Pena and John Focke. This book presents a process to systematically identify and quantify the spatial and functional needs and desires of prospective users as foundational input to the design of a new building. Historically significant buildings, ‘modern’ and otherwise, are a product of an original program and other factors that produced structure, spaces, assemblies and materials that collectively embody social, cultural and/or architectural significance. Seldom are historically-contributing building conditions in sync with programmatic objectives for a future use/reuse. Consequently, the application of a programming methodology for a new building to a set of existing spatial conditions and user desires most often creates potential if not real conflicts. Using the programming methodology for a new building in such situations too frequently results in decisions and actions that alter or destroy historically significant characteristics. Programming a new use for a historic property is/should be a creative exploration of the relationship between the definition of future needs and historic context. This presentation will consider the modern history and application of architectural programming and suggest alternative strategies to align reuse desires with the preservation of historically significant characteristics of a building. The goal is to produce the framework for a preserving and conserving important character defining features and producing a creative coherent connection between the past and the future resulting in a unique design outcome that enriches occupancy and productivity.

中文翻译：

---

建筑规划和现代历史建筑的新用途改造

摘要 美国的建筑编程是从 20 世纪中叶发展起来的一种方法论演变而来的，并在 1969 年出版的出版物（以及随后的四个版本）中被规范化，问题寻求，威廉 M. 佩纳和约翰福克的建筑编程入门。本书介绍了一个系统地识别和量化潜在用户的空间和功能需求和愿望的过程，作为新建筑设计的基础输入。具有历史意义的建筑，无论是“现代”还是其他，都是原始项目和其他因素的产物，这些因素产生了共同体现社会、文化和/或建筑意义的结构、空间、组件和材料。很少有历史贡献的建筑条件与未来使用/重用的计划目标同步。最后，将新建筑的编程方法应用于一组现有的空间条件和用户的愿望，通常会产生潜在的冲突，即使不是真正的冲突。在这种情况下过于频繁地使用新建筑的编程方法会导致改变或破坏历史重要特征的决策和行动。为历史遗产规划新用途是/应该是对未来需求定义与历史背景之间关系的创造性探索。本演讲将考虑建筑规划的现代历史和应用，并提出替代策略，以将再利用的愿望与保护建筑物的历史重要特征保持一致。