ABSTRACT This discussion note aims to show that Moti Mizrahi does not make clear whether the proponents of the semantic view of scientific progress reject or accept the inference rule of Addition. If they reject the rule, then it does not make sense that Mizrahi contrives different types of disjuncts ‘on behalf of’ proponents of the semantic view. If they accept the rule, then the characterisation of the semantic view that Mizrahi discusses has nothing to do with the supposedly arbitrariness of scientific progress, as Mizrahi contends.

中文翻译：

---

加法推理规则和科学进步的语义观：对米兹拉希的答复

摘要本讨论笔记旨在表明，莫蒂·米兹拉希（Moti Mizrahi）并未阐明科学进步的语义学观点的拥护者是否拒绝或接受加法的推理规则。如果他们拒绝该规则，那么米兹拉希“代表”语义观点的支持者捏造不同类型的析取词是没有意义的。如果他们接受了规则，那么正如米兹拉希所主张的那样，米兹拉希讨论的语义观点的表征与所谓的科学进步的任意性无关。