ABSTRACT

Along with colonization, land consolidation was the other great instrument of Francoist socio-structural policy. Land consolidation policy began with the 1952 legislation. It addressed land fragmentation into small plots whose extension, according to the Law, was uneconomic while creating notable obstacles to the development and modernization of agriculture. Land consolidation is a restructuring of territory into fewer and larger plots that allow roads or paths between them. In contrast to the Second Republic (1931–1936) agrarian reform, it avoided the matter of large-scale land ownership and its necessary redistribution. Through a micro-historical approach, this paper aims to investigate changes in the developmental model of the dictatorship, by incorporating the local actors and their resistances in the historical interpretation. This perspective will reveal the conflict between subaltern and dominant reasons. We will rely on the analysis of documentary sources of a legislative and regulatory nature, local documentation, as well as oral interviews with peasants and agricultural technicians who worked in Galizan rural areas.

摘要

与殖民化一样，土地合并是佛朗哥社会结构政策的另一个重要工具。土地整理政策始于1952年立法。它解决了土地分割成小块土地的问题，根据该法，这些小块土地的扩展是不经济的，同时给农业的发展和现代化造成了明显的障碍。土地整合是将领土重组为更少但更大的地块，并在它们之间留有道路或小路。与第二共和国（1931-1936）的土地改革相反，它避免了大规模土地所有权及其必要的重新分配问题。本文旨在通过微观历史的方法，将当地行为者及其抵抗纳入历史解释中，探讨独裁政权发展模式的变化。这一视角将揭示次要原因与主导原因之间的冲突。我们将依靠对立法和监管性质的文献资料、当地文献以及对在加利赞农村地区工作的农民和农业技术人员的口头采访的分析。