ABSTRACT

This study provides new insights into the internal dynamics and international integration of non-rentier sectors in Russia. Our approach consists in analysing the evolution of two non-rentier industries (agri-food and software), focusing on three groups of variables characterising their institutional environment, namely the macroeconomic context, public policies, and private strategies pursued by the main players. Based on the analysis of quantitative and qualitative data coming from field surveys and statistical databases, we introduce distinct forms of international integration that shed light on the players’ strategies in adapting to changes in macroeconomic variables. The following paradox emerged: although the macroeconomic constraints stemming from rent should have hindered the development of non-rentier sectors in a scheme characteristic of the classical ‘Dutch disease’ framework, we have observed that these two industries have been able to continue to develop, each following its own path. Our analysis shows that the mix of constraints and opportunities faced by these industries has shaped their partial autonomy vis-à-vis the rent-based ‘accumulation regime’ characteristic of the country.

摘要

这项研究为俄罗斯非食利者部门的内部动态和国际一体化提供了新的见解。我们的方法包括分析两个非食利者行业（农业食品和软件）的演变，重点关注表征其制度环境的三组变量，即宏观经济背景、公共政策和主要参与者所追求的私人战略。基于对来自实地调查和统计数据库的定量和定性数据的分析，我们引入了不同形式的国际一体化，阐明了参与者适应宏观经济变量变化的策略。出现了以下悖论：尽管来自租金的宏观经济约束本应在典型的“荷兰病”框架特征方案中阻碍非食利者部门的发展，但我们观察到这两个行业能够继续发展，各自走自己的路. 我们的分析表明，这些行业面临的制约因素和机遇的组合塑造了它们相对于该国以租金为基础的“积累制度”特征的部分自主权。