Research integrity (RI) is usually discussed in terms of responsibilities that individual researchers bear towards the scientific work they conduct, as well as responsibilities that institutions have to enable those individual researchers to do so. In addition to these two bearers of responsibility, a third category often surfaces, which is variably referred to as culture and practice. These notions merit further development beyond a residual category that is to contain everything that is not covered by attributions to individuals and institutions. This paper discusses how thinking in RI can take benefit from more specific ideas on practice and culture. We start by articulating elements of practice and culture, and explore how values central to RI are related to these elements. These insights help identify additional points of intervention for fostering responsible conduct. This helps to build “cultures and practices of research integrity”, as it makes clear that specific times and places are connected to specific practices and cultures and should have a place in the debate on Research Integrity. With this conceptual framework, practitioners as well as theorists can avoid using the notions as residual categories that de facto amount to vague, additional burdens of responsibility for the individual.

研究诚信(RI) 通常是根据个人研究人员对其所从事的科学工作所承担的责任以及机构使这些个人研究人员能够这样做的责任来讨论的。除了这两个责任承担者之外，经常会出现第三类，即文化和实践。. 这些概念值得进一步发展，超越一个剩余类别，即包含个人和机构归属未涵盖的所有内容。本文讨论了 RI 中的思考如何从更具体的实践和文化理念中受益。我们首先阐明实践和文化的元素，并探索 RI 的核心价值观如何与这些元素相关联。这些见解有助于确定其他干预点，以促进负责任的行为。这有助于建立“研究诚信的文化和实践”，因为它清楚地表明特定的时间和地点与特定的实践和文化有关，应该在关于研究诚信的辩论中占有一席之地。有了这个概念框架，